censorship

gag order

Court order prohibiting disclosure of information, facts, or the order itself—legal censorship by injunction.

A court-issued directive that prohibits a party from disclosing information, discussing a case, or publishing statements about it. Think of it as the legal system's favorite silencing tool.

Gag orders are typically used in criminal or civil proceedings to protect witness safety, preserve trial impartiality, or keep sensitive information confidential. Problem: they're increasingly weaponized to suppress speech about legitimate matters—especially when government agencies, law enforcement, or litigants with deep pockets want to bury inconvenient facts.

Why this matters for domain operators: gag orders can prohibit registrars, hosting providers, or domain owners from disclosing the existence of takedown requests, law enforcement inquiries, or legal proceedings. A registrar operating under a gag order cannot tell you a subpoena was served. You won't know your data was handed over. Transparency dies in a locked courtroom.

Offshore and privacy-focused registrars (including bunkerdomains) resist gag orders through jurisdictional distance and refusal to maintain detailed registrant records—there's less to gag about when you don't keep the data to begin with. Transparency reports help, but they're only as good as the jurisdiction's willingness to enforce disclosure rights.

Related: national security letters, which operate under their own aggressive gag provisions.